NYT Sparks Debate by Calling Cross Necklaces a "Hot Accessory"

The New York Times article attempted to explore the resurgence of cross necklaces in popular culture, noting their appearance on celebrities, politicians, and social media influencers. However, the framing of the cross as a "hot accessory" drew criticism from readers who felt it diminished the religious importance of the symbol. The Daily Mail and Cracked.com covered the controversy, highlighting the negative reactions and the "Arrested Development" joke that the headline inadvertently evoked. The NYT has previously reported on the trend in 2001, quoting Angela Arambulo, then fashion director of Vibe magazine, who stated unequivocally that crosses "have become a trend". The controversy underscores the challenges media outlets face when covering fashion trends that intersect with religion and cultural heritage. Readers felt that the NYT was out of touch. The paper’s Object of Desire column, which examines items with a cult following, recently reviewed an $190 soap dispenser. Similarly, the section recently ran a debate over whether a pair of $690 flip flops from The Row are worth the price.

The article was criticized for calling cross necklaces a "hot accessory," which many felt trivialized the religious significance of the cross.

Yes, the NYT's style section has been criticized for being out of touch with everyday consumers, particularly regarding luxury items.

Cher, Mary J. Blige, Paris Hilton and Lance Bass of N'SYNC

Do you think the New York Times was right to call cross necklaces a "hot accessory," or was it insensitive? Share your thoughts in the comments below! Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend! [Twitter/X share button] [LinkedIn share button] [Reddit share button]