Supreme Court Releases Opinions in June 2025

First Step Act (FSA) Sentencing Guidelines:: The court ruled in *Hewitt v. United States* that the FSA’s sentencing reduction guidelines apply to individuals resentenced after the Act’s enactment, even if their original sentence predates the FSA. This decision, however, saw a 5-4 split, highlighting differing interpretations of the Act’s retroactivity.

Deportation Orders:: In *Riley v. Bondi*, the court addressed the challenge timeframe for non-citizens facing deportation orders. The ruling clarified that an order denying a request for withholding of removal is distinct from a final order of removal, setting new precedents for immigration cases. The court also held that the 30-day filing deadline to challenge a final order is not jurisdictional and can be waived.

Why this matters:: These rulings provide clarity on the application of key legislation and the rights of individuals within the legal system. The *Hewitt* decision affects sentencing for numerous offenders, while the *Riley* case refines the process for challenging deportation orders.

A:: The First Step Act’s more lenient penalties apply to first-time offenders resentenced after the Act’s enactment, even if their original sentence was before the FSA.

A:: A denial of withholding of removal is not the same as a final order of removal, and the 30-day deadline to challenge a final order can be waived.

The Supreme Court’s decisions in June 2025 have clarified the application of the First Step Act and the process for challenging deportation orders.

These rulings impact individuals facing sentencing and deportation, providing important legal precedents.

Understanding these decisions can help those affected navigate the legal system more effectively.