Supreme Court Allows Terrorism Victims to Sue Palestinian Authority

The Supreme Court's decision resolves a long-standing legal battle, with Congress repeatedly amending the law to allow victims to sue after previous court rulings against them. The case involved a $655 million judgment initially awarded to victims under the Anti-Terrorism Act, which was later reversed by a federal appeals court in New York. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that U.S. courts lacked jurisdiction over the PLO and the Palestinian Authority, arguing that the 2019 law violated the Fifth Amendment.

The Supreme Court's ruling effectively reverses this decision, asserting that the 2019 law does not violate due process rights. The law allows U.S. courts to exercise jurisdiction if the defendants are found to have made payments to terrorists convicted of attacks and conducted any activity within the U.S. within 15 days after the law was enacted.

This decision aligns with the foreign policy and national security judgments of Congress and the President, as noted by Justice Brett Kavanaugh during oral arguments. The ruling ensures that victims like Ari Fuld, an American citizen killed in a 2018 terrorist attack, and other plaintiffs involved in the litigation can pursue their claims for damages.

The Anti-Terrorism Act is a federal law that allows American citizens to sue for damages caused by acts of terrorism.

The central legal question was whether the PLO and the Palestinian Authority could be subjected to the jurisdiction of U.S. federal courts, allowing victims of terrorist attacks to sue for damages.

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that victims of terrorism can sue Palestinian entities in U.S. courts, upholding the 2019 Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act.

Do you think this ruling will provide justice for victims of terrorism? Let us know your thoughts!

Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend!