Are the New York Rangers Tough Enough?

The debate around the Rangers' toughness intensified after Adam Fox was hit by Brandon Hagel during a game against Tampa Bay. The absence of immediate retaliation led to questions about the team's grit. While some, like veteran writer Al Greenberg, saw it as a lack of toughness, others argue that the hit was legal and clean, not warranting a response.

Super scout Jess Rubenstein offers an alternative perspective, suggesting that the Rangers' issue is emotional fragility rather than physical toughness. This viewpoint suggests deeper psychological factors affecting team performance.

Coach Mike Sullivan downplays the significance of the team's standings around Thanksgiving, referencing historical instances where teams outside the playoff picture in November still made it to the postseason. However, analyst Joe Fortunato paints a grim picture, arguing that the Rangers are stuck in a 'dead zone,' hampered by an aging roster and a lack of superstar talent. This raises concerns about the team's long-term prospects and ability to compete for the Stanley Cup. Sam Carrick and Will Cuylle, and Matt Rempe are examples of players who are proving the Rangers are not too soft.

Q: Was the hit on Adam Fox illegal?

No, the hit by Brandon Hagel was deemed a clean, legal hit according to NHL standards.

Q: What is the main concern about the Rangers?

The concerns range from a lack of physical toughness to emotional fragility and an aging roster without a clear path to Stanley Cup contention.

Q: How important is the Thanksgiving benchmark for the Rangers' playoff chances?

Coach Mike Sullivan believes it's not a definitive indicator, as teams have recovered from worse positions to make the playoffs.

Do you think the Rangers are tough enough to compete for the Stanley Cup? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend!