Tennis Stars Consider Boycott Over Grand Slam Revenue Sharing

Aryna Sabalenka and Jannik Sinner have publicly voiced their discontent with the current revenue sharing model at Grand Slams.

Jessica Pegula is actively organizing players to push for a larger percentage of tournament revenue to be allocated to prize money.

Players are drawing comparisons to other professional sports leagues like the NFL and NHL, where athletes receive approximately 50% of the revenue, a stark contrast to the figures in tennis.

The French Open is reportedly allocating under 14.9% of its revenue to players in 2026, a decrease from 15.5% in 2024, fueling player frustration.

The fragmented governance structure of tennis, with seven different organizing bodies, complicates efforts to reach a consensus on revenue sharing.

For Players: Stay informed about the negotiations and be prepared to take collective action if necessary.

For Fans: Understand the players' concerns and support their efforts to achieve a fairer revenue sharing model.

Professional tennis players, particularly those outside the top tier who rely on prize money to sustain their careers.

Grand Slam organizers, who risk losing revenue and prestige if a boycott occurs.

Tennis fans, who may be deprived of the opportunity to watch their favorite players compete in major tournaments.

Q: What percentage of revenue do tennis players currently receive from Grand Slams?

Q: What are the players demanding?

Q: Who is leading the player efforts?

Top tennis players are considering boycotting Grand Slams over revenue sharing.

Jessica Pegula is spearheading the effort to organize players and demand a fairer deal.

The fragmented governance structure of tennis poses a significant challenge to achieving consensus.

A potential boycott could have major implications for the sport.