Europe and Antisemitism After October 7: A Failure to Learn?

Following the October 7 attacks, Europe faced a critical test of its commitment to combating antisemitism. While initial reactions from many European leaders included expressions of solidarity, a concerning trend of moral retreat and the normalization of anti-Israel narratives quickly emerged. This shift has manifested in various ways, including the distortion of reality in political discourse, the failure to provide adequate protection for Jewish citizens, and the amplification of anti-Israel sentiment in the media.

Even before October 7, Europe was experiencing a surge in antisemitism, stemming from the far right, radicalized segments of the far left, and Islamist networks. The response was often rhetorical, lacking concrete action and consequences. In England, indifference and apathy were prevalent. What followed October 7 was not moral clarity but retreat. Not solidarity but equivocation.

The demonization of Israel has become acceptable, even fashionable, in mainstream culture, politics, and international diplomacy. Terms like “genocide” have been weaponized against Israel, inverting reality and betraying the historical memory Europe claims to uphold.

The resurgence of antisemitism is not a new phenomenon but rather a continuation of historical trends. The roots of modern antisemitism can be traced back to Cold War propaganda, where the Soviet Union portrayed Zionism as racism and Israel as a colonial outpost. These narratives have persisted and evolved, fueled by social media and adopted by Western academics and social activists.

The Economist calls it 'the world’s oldest hatred,' but that does not mean antisemitism is immutable. With dedicated, coordinated effort, old prejudices can be overcome. The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism offers a potential road map for tackling the issue.

Why is antisemitism increasing in Europe?

Factors include historical amnesia, the resurgence of Cold War narratives, the influence of social media, and the exploitation of anti-Israel sentiment for political purposes.

How does the Cold War contribute to modern antisemitism?

Cold War propaganda framed Israel as a colonial entity, fueling anti-Zionist sentiment and laying the groundwork for contemporary tropes and narratives.

What can be done to combat antisemitism?

Education, awareness, condemnation of incitement, and solidarity with the Jewish people are crucial steps. Promoting the IHRA definition of antisemitism can also help.

Do you think Europe has learned the lessons of the past? How can individuals and institutions work together to combat antisemitism? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend!