NYT Sparks Debate by Calling Cross Necklaces a "Hot Accessory"

In-Depth Analysis

The New York Times article attempted to explore the resurgence of cross necklaces in popular culture, noting their appearance on celebrities, politicians, and social media influencers. However, the framing of the cross as a "hot accessory" drew criticism from readers who felt it diminished the religious importance of the symbol. The Daily Mail and Cracked.com covered the controversy, highlighting the negative reactions and the "Arrested Development" joke that the headline inadvertently evoked. The NYT has previously reported on the trend in 2001, quoting Angela Arambulo, then fashion director of Vibe magazine, who stated unequivocally that crosses "have become a trend". The controversy underscores the challenges media outlets face when covering fashion trends that intersect with religion and cultural heritage. Readers felt that the NYT was out of touch. The paper’s Object of Desire column, which examines items with a cult following, recently reviewed an $190 soap dispenser. Similarly, the section recently ran a debate over whether a pair of $690 flip flops from The Row are worth the price.

Read source article

FAQ

Why did the New York Times article cause controversy?

The article was criticized for calling cross necklaces a "hot accessory," which many felt trivialized the religious significance of the cross.

Has the New York Times faced similar criticism before?

Yes, the NYT's style section has been criticized for being out of touch with everyday consumers, particularly regarding luxury items.

Who was wearing cross neclaces in the 90s?

Cher, Mary J. Blige, Paris Hilton and Lance Bass of N'SYNC

Takeaways

Be mindful of the cultural and religious significance of symbols when discussing fashion trends.
Media outlets should approach sensitive topics with care and avoid language that could be seen as trivializing or disrespectful.
Consider the historical context of fashion trends and avoid presenting them as entirely new phenomena if they have been popular in the past.

Discussion

Do you think the New York Times was right to call cross necklaces a "hot accessory," or was it insensitive? Share your thoughts in the comments below! Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend! [Twitter/X share button] [LinkedIn share button] [Reddit share button]

Sources

A Hot Accessory, at the Intersection of Faith and Culture ‘The New York Times’ Just Accidentally Became An ‘Arrested Development Joke’ New York Times are berated for calling holy Christian symbol 'in vogue'

Disclaimer

This article was compiled by Yanuki using publicly available data and trending information. The content may summarize or reference third-party sources that have not been independently verified. While we aim to provide timely and accurate insights, the information presented may be incomplete or outdated.

All content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Yanuki makes no representations or warranties regarding the reliability or completeness of the information.

This article may include links to external sources for further context. These links are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement.

Always do your own research (DYOR) before making any decisions based on the information presented.