Why did Championship clubs reject the VAR challenge system?
Concerns over cost, potential delays, and the negative impact on the fan experience were key factors.
Football / Championship
English Football League (EFL) Championship clubs have rejected the implementation of a Video Assistant Referee (VAR) challenge system for the 2026/27 season. The proposal, known as Football Video Support (FVS), aimed to provide managers wit...
The Football Video Support (FVS) system, presented by the Professional Game Match Officials (PGMO), offered a modified version of VAR intended to minimize resource requirements. Under the FVS proposal, managers would have been granted two challenges per game, enabling them to request reviews of specific incidents. A replay operator would then present the referee with camera angles at a pitchside monitor.
The rejection of VAR in the Championship contrasts with its continued use in the Premier League, despite its unpopularity among fans. A recent survey by the Football Supporters' Association revealed that a significant majority of top-flight fans oppose VAR, citing concerns over its impact on the spontaneity of goal celebrations and the overall matchday experience.
While VAR's powers are set to be extended in the Premier League, with the option to check corners and second yellow cards, Championship clubs have opted to maintain the status quo, prioritizing the traditional matchday experience and managing costs.
Concerns over cost, potential delays, and the negative impact on the fan experience were key factors.
Goal Line Technology will continue to be used.
FVS aimed to reduce resource requirements and give managers a limited number of challenges per match.
Do you think the Championship made the right decision in rejecting the VAR challenge system? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend!
This article was compiled by Yanuki using publicly available data and trending information. The content may summarize or reference third-party sources that have not been independently verified. While we aim to provide timely and accurate insights, the information presented may be incomplete or outdated.
All content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Yanuki makes no representations or warranties regarding the reliability or completeness of the information.
This article may include links to external sources for further context. These links are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement.
Always do your own research (DYOR) before making any decisions based on the information presented.