What is House Joint Resolution 73?
House Joint Resolution 73 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest, medical emergencies, and fetal anomalies.
Yanuki
ARTICLE DETAIL
ACLU Sues Missouri Over Abortion Ballot Language | Davis Cyclist Fatality Prompts Safety Concerns and Calls for Reform | JetBlue Flights Grounded Nationwide: What Travelers Need to Know | JetBlue Requests Ground Stop at All Destinations Nationwide | Powerball Jackpot Won in Arkansas | Nick Shirley to Speak at CPAC 2026, Discusses Voter Fraud Allegations | Bishopville Man Wins $2 Million Lottery | Teacher Dies in High School Prank Gone Wrong; Wife Asks for Charges to Be Dropped | Luxury Real Estate Brokers Convicted in Sex Trafficking Trial | ACLU Sues Missouri Over Abortion Ballot Language | Davis Cyclist Fatality Prompts Safety Concerns and Calls for Reform | JetBlue Flights Grounded Nationwide: What Travelers Need to Know | JetBlue Requests Ground Stop at All Destinations Nationwide | Powerball Jackpot Won in Arkansas | Nick Shirley to Speak at CPAC 2026, Discusses Voter Fraud Allegations | Bishopville Man Wins $2 Million Lottery | Teacher Dies in High School Prank Gone Wrong; Wife Asks for Charges to Be Dropped | Luxury Real Estate Brokers Convicted in Sex Trafficking Trial
News / State News
ACLU Sues Missouri Over Abortion Ballot Language
The ACLU of Missouri has filed a lawsuit against Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, challenging the ballot language for a proposed constitutional amendment, House Joint Resolution 73, which seeks to restrict abortion access. The ACL...
Key Insights
- The lawsuit alleges the ballot language is 'intentionally misleading' and the summary statement is 'inaccurate.' Why this matters: This could confuse voters and lead to unintended consequences at the ballot box.
- House Joint Resolution 73, if approved, would ban abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape and incest. Why this matters: This would significantly restrict abortion access in Missouri compared to the current status.
- The ACLU claims the amendment will appear on the ballot as Amendment 3, the same name as the measure that legalized abortions last year. Why this matters: This could cause confusion among voters who may think they are voting on the same issue.
In-Depth Analysis
The ACLU's lawsuit focuses on the summary statement and fair ballot language certified by Secretary of State Denny Hoskins. The lawsuit claims that the language fails to adequately inform voters that the amendment would eliminate a woman’s right to reproductive freedom and abolish constitutional protections for prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, and birth control.
The proposed amendment is a Republican response to the 2024 election when nearly 52% of Missouri voters supported Amendment 3, which protects the right to abortion up to fetal viability. Republicans argue that Amendment 3 went too far and that Missourians were deceived by a misleading campaign. The current proposal allows abortion access in cases of rape and incest up to 12 weeks of pregnancy, as well as in medical emergencies and cases of fetal anomalies. It also includes a ban on hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and surgeries for gender transition for minors.
The lawsuit also argues that the ballot initiative violates the state’s single subject clause by including the transgender provisions and a proposal to change state law on where certain lawsuits can be filed.
FAQ
Why is the ACLU suing the Missouri Secretary of State?
The ACLU is suing because they believe the ballot language certified by the Secretary of State is intentionally misleading and aims to overturn voter-approved protections for reproductive rights.
What does Amendment 3 do?
Amendment 3 protects the right to abortion up to fetal viability.
Takeaways
- The future of abortion access in Missouri is uncertain and depends on the outcome of the lawsuit and the 2026 election.
- Voters should pay close attention to the ballot language and understand the potential impact of their vote.
- The proposed amendment also includes provisions related to gender-affirming care for minors, which could have significant consequences for transgender youth in Missouri.
Discussion
Do you think the proposed amendment is a fair representation of the issues? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend!
Sources
Disclaimer
This article was compiled by Yanuki using publicly available data and trending information. The content may summarize or reference third-party sources that have not been independently verified. While we aim to provide timely and accurate insights, the information presented may be incomplete or outdated.
All content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Yanuki makes no representations or warranties regarding the reliability or completeness of the information.
This article may include links to external sources for further context. These links are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement.
Always do your own research (DYOR) before making any decisions based on the information presented.