What is Candace Owens claiming about the Charlie Kirk shooting?
Candace Owens is claiming that the shooting was a planned setup involving multiple individuals, not just a lone shooter.
Yanuki
ARTICLE DETAIL
Candace Owens Claims Charlie Kirk Assassination Was a Setup | Bishopville Man Wins $2 Million Lottery | Teacher Dies in High School Prank Gone Wrong; Wife Asks for Charges to Be Dropped | Luxury Real Estate Brokers Convicted in Sex Trafficking Trial | Military Draft Concerns Rise Amidst Iran Conflict | Trump Press Conference: U.S.-Israel-Led Iran War Enters Second Week | Security Guard Killed Protecting Woman at Acworth Bar | Celebrating Commonwealth Day 2026: Unity and Opportunity | Longtime Boston Lead Singer Tommy DeCarlo Dies | Candace Owens Claims Charlie Kirk Assassination Was a Setup | Bishopville Man Wins $2 Million Lottery | Teacher Dies in High School Prank Gone Wrong; Wife Asks for Charges to Be Dropped | Luxury Real Estate Brokers Convicted in Sex Trafficking Trial | Military Draft Concerns Rise Amidst Iran Conflict | Trump Press Conference: U.S.-Israel-Led Iran War Enters Second Week | Security Guard Killed Protecting Woman at Acworth Bar | Celebrating Commonwealth Day 2026: Unity and Opportunity | Longtime Boston Lead Singer Tommy DeCarlo Dies
News / US News
Candace Owens Claims Charlie Kirk Assassination Was a Setup
Candace Owens has publicly questioned the official narrative surrounding the shooting of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA. She suggests the event was a planned setup with multiple individuals involved, sparking widespread discussi...
Key Insights
- Candace Owens believes the Charlie Kirk shooting was a planned setup with multiple people involved.
- She claims Tyler Robinson, the accused shooter, may not have acted alone and his fingerprints weren't the only ones on the gun.
- Owens points to Lance Twiggs as potentially having a more significant role in the incident.
- She was pranked on her own show with a bogus tip leading back to her own lawyer's address while investigating the case, but she doubled down on her theory.
In-Depth Analysis
Candace Owens' claims center around what she perceives as inconsistencies in the publicly available information regarding the Charlie Kirk shooting. She highlights the lack of footage showing the exact moment the shot was fired and suggests that Tyler Robinson's involvement was limited. Owens also introduced Lance Twiggs into the narrative, claiming he played a more significant role, referencing a TMZ video as potential evidence.
Owens' investigation led her to explore a supposed Egyptian military plane's involvement, a theory that was widely debunked after she mistook UTC for a Utah time zone. Despite this, she continues to pursue the theory. She even read out a tip on air that was intended to prank her, as it led to the address of her own lawyer. She claims that a foreign dignitary was picked up after arriving from Provo the morning of Charlie’s assassination on the Egyptian plane, and then transferred to 920 King for some joint operation.
It is important to note that these claims are based on Owens' personal investigation and have not been substantiated by law enforcement or other credible sources.
FAQ
Who is Tyler Robinson?
Tyler Robinson is the man accused of shooting Charlie Kirk.
Who is Lance Twiggs?
Candace Owens claims Lance Twiggs may have had a bigger role in the shooting, potentially being more involved than initially reported.
Takeaways
- Candace Owens has presented an alternative narrative surrounding the Charlie Kirk shooting.
- Her claims involve multiple individuals and suggest a planned setup.
- These claims are controversial and have not been verified by official sources.
Discussion
Do you think Candace Owens' claims hold any weight? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Share this article with others who need to stay ahead of this trend!
Sources
Disclaimer
This article was compiled by Yanuki using publicly available data and trending information. The content may summarize or reference third-party sources that have not been independently verified. While we aim to provide timely and accurate insights, the information presented may be incomplete or outdated.
All content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Yanuki makes no representations or warranties regarding the reliability or completeness of the information.
This article may include links to external sources for further context. These links are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement.
Always do your own research (DYOR) before making any decisions based on the information presented.